Fallacy of Most Marketed Candidate(Political Product)
The following are some cardinal points and differences we must appreciate about what we normally describe as “Most Marketed Political Product” in politics;
The most Marketed Product is NOT the same as the most Product’s Sellability.
The most Marketed Product is NOT the same as Product Dominance.
The most Marketed Product is NOT the same as Market Dominance(or Market Leadership).
The most Marketed Product is NOT the same as the most Preferred Product on the market.
The most Marketed Product is NOT the same as Market Acceptability.
Dr.Razak Kojo Opoku
Within our political space, it’s imperative to note that the votes’ marketplace has a complex sales dynamics. There have been instances where the Most Marketed Product might keep declining in sales at the votes’ marketplace due to various failed factors.
A detailed diagnosis and a proper market research would help us to understand why the Most Marketed Product sometimes does not do well at the marketplace. The same process, when followed well, would also prescribe solutions and road map to resolve such issues.
On the other hand, too much sycophancy and complacency without taking time to review the prevailing reality on the votes’ marketplace always collapse the political agenda and dreams of the Most Marketed Product together with its organization.
Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo has submitted her preliminary response to President John Mahama following petitions seeking her removal from office.
This development comes as the 10-day window granted to her to respond to the petitions elapses today, Monday, April 7.
The petitions were received by the President earlier last month and have triggered national attention, prompting legal and constitutional debates on the appropriate procedure for handling such matters.
Gertrude Torkornoo and President John Mahama
Justice Torkornoo, in a letter addressed to the President last week, had requested copies of the petitions and asked for at least seven days to respond, in line with the requirements of due process and fairness.
Her response, now formally submitted to the President and the Council of State, is expected to be considered as part of the consultation process with the Council of State under Article 146(6) of the 1992 Constitution.
The submission marks a significant milestone in the unfolding constitutional process that could determine whether a committee will be established to investigate the allegations against the Chief Justice.
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court is set to hear a suit on April 9, filed by Old Tafo MP Vincent Ekow Assafuah, challenging the legality of the President initiating the removal process without first notifying the Chief Justice.
The law that surrounds the removal of the Chief Justice is enshrined in Article 146 of the constitution.
Article 146 – Removal Of Justices Of Superior Courts And Chairmen Of Regional Tribunals
1) A Justice of the Superior Court or a Chairman of a Regional Tribunal shall not be removed from office except for stated misbehaviour or incompetence or on ground of inability to perform the functions of his office arising from infirmity of Body or mind.
(2) A Justice of the Superior Court of Judicature or a Chairman of a Regional Tribunal may only be removed in accordance with the procedure specified in this article.
(3) If the President receives a petition for the removal of a Justice of a Superior Court other than the Chief Justice or for the removal of the Chairman of a Regional Tribunal, he shall refer the petition to the Chief Justice, who shall determine whether there is a prima facie case.
(4) Where the Chief Justice decides that there is a prima facie case, he shall set up a committee consisting of three Justices of the Superior Courts or Chairmen of the Regional Tribunals or both, appointed by the Judicial Council and two other persons who are not members of the Council of State, nor members of Parliament, nor lawyers, and who shall be appointed by the Chief Justice on the advice of the Council of State.
(5) The committee appointed under clause (4) of this article shall investigate the complaint and shall make its recommendations to the Chief Justice who shall forward them to the President.
(6) Where the petition is for the removal of the Chief Justice, the President shall, acting in consultation with the Council of State, appoint a committee consisting of two Justices of the Supreme Court, one of whom shall be appointed chairman by the President, and three other persons who are not members of the Council of State, nor members of Parliament, nor lawyers.
(7) The committee appointed under clause (6) of this article shall inquire into the petition and recommend to the President whether the Chief Justice ought to be removed from office.
(8) All proceedings under this article shall be held in camera, and the Justice or Chairman against whom the petition is made is entitled to be heard in his defence by himself or by a lawyer or other expert of his choice.
(9) The President shall, in each case, act in accordance with the recommendations of the committee.
(10) Where a petition has been referred to a committee under this article, the President may-
(a) in the case of the Chief Justice, acting in accordance with the advice of the Council of State, by warrant signed by him, suspend the Chief Justice;
(b) in the case of any other Justice of a Superior Court or of a Chairman of a Regional Tribunal, acting in accordance with the advice of the Judicial Council, suspend that Justice or that Chairman of a Regional Tribunal.
(11) The President may, at any time, revoke a suspension under this article.Source: Kenneth Awotwe Darko
Joyce Bawah Mogtari, Presidential Advisor and Special Aide to President John Dramani Mahama, has issued a formal demand to the Bono Regional Chairman of the New Patriotic Party (NPP), requesting an unqualified apology and a GH₵10 million compensation over what she describes as defamatory remarks made during a televised interview.
Abronye DC Joyce Bawah Mogtari
The legal notice, dated April 3, 2025, and issued by R.O. Solomon Consulting, accuses Abronye of making “false, reckless, and malicious” statements on Net 2 TV on March 26, 2025.
During the broadcast, Abronye allegedly claimed that Mrs. Mogtari was advised against pursuing a ministerial role and instead opted for a “stress-free presidential staffer position” with a monthly salary of GHS95,000. He reportedly went further to say this had made her “disrespectful to Ghanaians.”
According to the letter, these statements have since circulated widely online, including on platforms such as GhanaWeb, subjecting Mrs. Mogtari to “serious embarrassment,” public ridicule, and reputational harm.
The legal team argues that the remarks have sparked a wave of disparaging public commentary and persistent inquiries from both personal and professional circles.
They emphasized that Abronye’s statements were not only factually incorrect but also lacked any justification—especially given that details about Mrs. Mogtari’s appointment are not classified and could have been easily verified.
As a result, the legal team is demanding the following:
An immediate retraction and public apology published across platforms that disseminated the statements, including Net 2 TV, Ghanaweb, MyJoyOnline, Channel One TV, and Citi FM.
Compensation of GHS10 million for the damage caused to Mrs. Mogtari’s reputation and image.
The Ghana Tertiary Education Commission (GTEC) expresses its deep concern regarding the increasing prevalence of Honorary Doctorate degrees and Professorship titles that are conferred upon individuals by various Institutions, both within Ghana and abroad. In light of this trend, the Commission has observed the use of the titles Doctor (Dr.) and Professor (Prof.) by recipients of such awards.
These practices are deemed misleading and serve to misinform both the Academic community and the general public. Consequently, the Commission seeks to clarify its position on this matter for the benefit of the public and those affected.
Award of Honorary Degrees: Honorary degrees are conferred judiciously and strategically to individuals of exceptional achievement and distinguished service, whose contributions align with and enhance the values and mission of the conferring institution.
While the Commission acknowledges and encourages the responsible recognition of distinguished individuals by higher education institutions, it asserts that such honours should only be conferred by accredited and duly recognised institutions within the realm of Ghanaian higher education.
FURTHERMORE, IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT THESE TITLES ARE NOT APPENDED TO A RECIPIENT’S NAME AS PART OF THEIR CREDENTIALS.
The appropriation of these honorary titles as part of the name of any recipient is deemed unethical and contravenes several provisions of the Education Regulatory Bodies Act, 2020 (Act 1023), as well as other pertinent laws governing higher education in Ghana.
The Mandate of GTEC: Section 8 (3) d of the Education Regulatory Bodies Act mandates the Commission to regulate the use of higher education nomenclature and titles, including “university”, “college”, “Emeritus”, “Professor”, “Doctor”, “Chartered”, and related terms. Thus, the Commission, in its pursuit to uphold the integrity of Ghanaian tertiary education, appeals to the general public and institutions within the Ghanaian higher education landscape to collaborate in this endeavour.
In light of these concerns, the Commission implores individuals to exercise personal responsibility regarding this issue and refrain from using these titles as part of their names. Higher education institutions are advised to exercise restraint in the conferral of these honours, as we collectively honour and promote partnerships with our stakeholders to develop and maintain the integrity of Ghanaian higher education.
Conclusion: To safeguard the integrity of Ghana’s higher education system and to uphold its deserved credibility and respect, the Ghana Tertiary Education Commission demands that all stakeholders refrain from the misuse of honorary academi: titles.
Where persistency to deliberately set aside this request is observed, the Commission shall reserve the right to evoke its regulatory functions to sanction the individuals and/or institutions involved that ultimately seek to dilute the value of true Doctoral education and potentially mislead students, academia and the general public.
Ahmed Jinapor Abdulai
Director -Centred,GTEC
We are thrilled to announce that Isaac Essuman, a talented young Ghanaian leader, has been selected to participate in the prestigious Young Professional Fellowship Canada 2025.
In an exclusive interview with our online portal, Isaac shared his excitement and gratitude for being chosen for this enriching opportunity. “I’m absolutely thrilled to share my incredible experience of being selected for the partially funded Young Professional Fellowship Canada 2025,” he said.
Isaac’s selection for the fellowship is a testament to his passion for professional growth, community development and leadership. With a strong background in youth empowerment and advocacy, he is confident that his skills and experience align with the fellowship’s objectives.
As he prepares to embark on this journey, Isaac believes that the fellowship will equip him with practical skills in leadership, project management and communication. He looks forward to applying these skills in real-world scenarios, working on projects that address pressing social and economic challenges.
We caught up with Isaac to learn more about his expectations and aspirations for the fellowship. When asked about what he hopes to achieve, he emphasized his commitment to making a positive impact in his community and beyond.
Isaac’s selection for the Young Professional Fellowship Canada 2025 is a proud moment for Ghana and we are honored to share his story with our readers. We wish him all the best as he embarks on this incredible journey and look forward to following his progress.
Isaac as part of this incredible journey organized an empowerment program with community members on the need to be transparent and accountable. Thereby educating them on the Right to Information Act, 2019 (Act 989)
President John Mahama has given Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo 10 days to submit a preliminary response to three petitions demanding her removal from office.
The directive was contained in a letter signed by Callistus Mahama, Secretary to the President. The Chief Justice requested copies of the petitions on Thursday, March 27.
This come on the back of petitions submitted by three individuals on February 14 and March 17, 2025, alleging misconduct and abuse of power.
President John Mahama and Chief Justice Torkonoo
According to the letter, President Mahama had initially written to Doe Adjaho, Chairman of the Council of State, on March 24, 2025, forwarding the petitions for consultation, as required under Article 146(6) of the Constitution.
The Council of State consented to this process on March 27, 2025, after which the petitions were sent to the Chief Justice for her comments.
Council of State on petitions to remove Chief Justice
However, the President also raised concerns over a leaked letter from Chief Justice Torkonoo, dated March 27, 2025, which was circulated on social media before he had the chance to review it.
The law that surrounds the removal of the Chief Justice is enshrined in Article 146 of the Constitution.
Article 146 – Removal Of Justices Of Superior Courts And Chairmen Of Regional Tribunals
1) A Justice of the Superior Court or a Chairman of a Regional Tribunal shall not be removed from office except for stated misbehaviour or incompetence or on ground of inability to perform the functions of his office arising from infirmity of Body or mind.
(2) A Justice of the Superior Court of Judicature or a Chairman of a Regional Tribunal may only be removed in accordance with the procedure specified in this article.
(3) If the President receives a petition for the removal of a Justice of a Superior Court other than the Chief Justice or for the removal of the Chairman of a Regional Tribunal, he shall refer the petition to the Chief Justice, who shall determine whether there is a prima facie case.
(4) Where the Chief Justice decides that there is a prima facie case, he shall set up a committee consisting of three Justices of the Superior Courts or Chairmen of the Regional Tribunals or both, appointed by the Judicial Council and two other persons who are not members of the Council of State, nor members of Parliament, nor lawyers, and who shall be appointed by the Chief Justice on the advice of the Council of State.
(5) The committee appointed under clause (4) of this article shall investigate the complaint and shall make its recommendations to the Chief Justice who shall forward them to the President.
(6) Where the petition is for the removal of the Chief Justice, the President shall, acting in consultation with the Council of State, appoint a committee consisting of two Justices of the Supreme Court, one of whom shall be appointed chairman by the President, and three other persons who are not members of the Council of State, nor members of Parliament, nor lawyers.
(7) The committee appointed under clause (6) of this article shall inquire into the petition and recommend to the President whether the Chief Justice ought to be removed from office.
(8) All proceedings under this article shall be held in camera, and the Justice or Chairman against whom the petition is made is entitled to be heard in his defence by himself or by a lawyer or other expert of his choice.
(9) The President shall, in each case, act in accordance with the recommendations of the committee.
(10) Where a petition has been referred to a committee under this article, the President may-
(a) in the case of the Chief Justice, acting in accordance with the advice of the Council of State, by warrant signed by him, suspend the Chief Justice;
(b) in the case of any other Justice of a Superior Court or of a Chairman of a Regional Tribunal, acting in accordance with the advice of the Judicial Council, suspend that Justice or that Chairman of a Regional Tribunal.
(11) The President may, at any time, revoke a suspension under this article.
Former Kumasi Metropolitan Assembly (KMA) boss Sam Pyne has vehemently kicked against the likely dismissal of Chief Justice Gertrude Araba Esaaba Sackey Torkornoo by President John Dramani Mahama.
Following the submission of three petitions to remove the Chief Justice, President John Mahama has begun consultations with the Council of State.According to a statement from Minister for Government Communications Felix Kwakye Ofosu, the president forwarding the petitions to the Council of State is in line with the constitutional process outlined in Article 146 of the 1992 Constitution.
Samuel Pyne President John Mahama
Article 146, Clauses 6 states, “Where the petition is for the removal of the Chief Justice, the President shall, acting in consultation with the Council of State, appoint a committee consisting of two Justices of the Supreme Court, one of whom shall be appointed chairman by the President, and three other persons who are not members of the Council of State, nor members of Parliament, nor lawyers.”
Araba Esaaba Sackey Torkornoo
Clause 7 expounds that the committee “shall inquire into the petition and recommend to the President whether the Chief Justice ought to be removed from office.”But to Sam Pyne, the petitions are a “preconceived plot” by President Mahama.He argued on Peace FM’s “Kokrokoo” show that the President, in 2022, made certain statements purportedly aimed to dismiss Chief Justice Gertrude Torkornoo.
“On the 28th of August, 2022, President Mahama met NDC lawyers and some leaders and told them something and I am quoting him as reported… He said ‘it will take a new Chief Justice to repair the broken image of the Judiciary’… So, this is a premeditated attempt” to remove the Chief Justice. Sam Pyne lamented.
Sam Pyne further admonished the president to make the content of the petitions public for Ghanaians to know whether removing the Chief Justice is a judicious decision or a political witch-hunt.
“We must know the identities of the petitioners and what is contained in the petition,” he insisted.
Chief Justice Gertrude Torkonoo has formally written to President John Dramani Mahama, requesting copies of petitions filed against her that seek her removal from office.
Her request comes after the president received three petitions and forwarded them to the Council of State for advice, in accordance with constitutional provisions.
In her letter, Chief Justice Torkonoo stressed the importance of due process and asked to be provided with the petitions to enable her to respond appropriately.
Chief Justice Gertrude Torkonoo
President John Mahama
“I am by this letter humbly and respectfully asking His Excellency the President and eminent members of the Council of State to forward the petitions against me to me and allow me at least seven days after receipt of the same to provide my response to you, which response can then form part of the materials that you conduct the consultation anticipated under 146(6), before the possible setting up of a Committee of Inquiry under article 146(7),” part of the letter stated
Victims of the recent devastating fire at Adum in Kumasi have rejected a donation of 1,500 bags of rice, 800 boxes of cooking oil, and soap provided by the Interior Minister and Member of Parliament for Asawase, Muntaka Mubarak.
The donation, intended to support those affected by the fire, which destroyed several properties and left many businesses in ruins, has sparked controversy following the victims’ decision to refuse the items.
a scene from the Minister’s visit
The affected traders expressed their dissatisfaction with the aid, stating that the donated goods do not align with their immediate needs, as they require financial assistance and business support to begin their recovery.
President John Dramani Mahama has nominated a new batch of District Chief Executives (DCEs) for eight out of the 16 regions, to spearhead local governance and development across the country.
The appointments, made in accordance with Article 243(1) of the 1992 Constitution and Section 20(1) of the Local Governance Act, 2016 (Act 936), are part of the government’s efforts to strengthen local governance and accelerate development.
The move aligns with President Mahama’s vision of ensuring effective administration at the district level to drive grassroots transformation.
A statement signed by the Minister for Local Government, Chieftaincy, and Religious Affairs, Ahmed Ibrahim, confirmed the nominations, stating that the appointees must secure approval from their respective District Assemblies before assuming office.
